When a rental property is vacant, it is natural to focus on the rent that is not coming in. One week empty can feel expensive. But approving the first applicant just to avoid a vacancy can cost far more in the long run.
The first tenant is not always the best tenant.
A poor tenancy can lead to rent arrears, damage, complaints, insurance issues, Tribunal applications, and weeks or months of stress. By comparison, waiting a little longer for the right tenant can be a very sensible investment decision.
This is where good property management makes a real difference.
A professional property manager should not simply be trying to “get someone in”. Their role is to protect the landlord’s investment. That means marketing the property well, pricing it correctly, checking applications carefully, and having the confidence to say, “Not this one, let’s wait.”
Under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, tenants have clear obligations, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and not damaging the premises. But when things go wrong, enforcing those obligations still takes time, evidence, process and often a Tribunal application.
That is why prevention matters.
A short vacancy is visible. A bad tenancy is often far more costly.
The goal should never be to place the first available tenant. The goal should be to place the right tenant, with the right checks completed, and the tenancy set up properly from day one.
Sometimes the best decision a landlord can make is to wait another week.
Back